APYRoute. One objective. Every chain. The best route.

Omnichain yield intelligence

Compare DeFi yield opportunities by what you could keep, not just the advertised rate. APYRoute weighs route costs, risk, liquidity and evidence against your capital and time horizon — then explains which routes fit.

Find My Route Explore Opportunities

Read-only intelligence. APYRoute does not custody funds or sign transactions.

Understand the route Independent yield intelligence

A bigger APY.
A smaller outcome.

An advertised annual yield is only the start. Fees, transfers and exit costs can change what you actually keep.

Same capital. Same horizon.$500 · 30 daysIllustrative economics

Higher headline yield

Less to keep

12.5%Advertised APY

Gross return: +$4.86
Route costs & impact: −$18.12

Estimated net gain
over 30 days−$13.25

Lower-friction route

More to keep

8.2%Advertised APY

Gross return: +$3.25
Route costs & impact: −$2.01

Estimated net gain
over 30 days+$1.24

The lower APY leaves more in your pocket. That’s why a universal leaderboard isn’t enough.

Modeled, not guaranteed. Fixed illustrative entry/exit costs: $12/$6 versus $1.20/$0.80. Includes yield foregone on entry costs; assumes constant APY.

Every angle.
One clear route.

APYRoute compares ways to earn on digital assets across the available DeFi dataset. It evaluates the whole decision, through the lens of your capital and time.

See the result

Many possible paths pass through six precision evaluation layers and converge into one cyan route. — Many possibilitiesA route that fits

Net return: What remains after costs.
Risk: What could go wrong.
Liquidity: How you get in and out.
Route costs: What the journey takes.
Sustainability: What keeps yield going.
Evidence: What backs the analysis.

What goes into the evaluation?

APYRoute models net return after relevant costs, compares risk separately from evidence coverage, checks entry and exit liquidity, and considers yield sustainability and route friction where the dataset supports them. Missing or stale information must remain visible. The current preview uses synthetic fixtures; production chain and protocol coverage is still under investigation.

Your goal in.
A reasoned route out.

Tell us the amount, the time and what matters to you. APYRoute compares the paths and explains the fit.

1 Set your context

Starting capital: $5,000USD
Holding period: 90days
Your preference: Balance return & risk

Your assumptions. Your decision.

2 Evaluate the whole path

APYRouteCompare · model · evaluate

EconomicsRiskLiquidityEvidence

3 Understand your options

01Cedar ReserveExplained fit+$110.18

02Alder LendingAlternative route

03Birch PoolDifferent trade-offs

Ranked opportunities, costs and reasons.
Illustrative output, not live opportunities.

From your assumptions to a comparison you can interrogate.

Set your objective

Not just a ranking.
A reason to choose.

See what you could keep, what the route costs, and why it fits. Keep the assumptions and trade-offs in view.

Your objective

Balance return & risk

Capital$5,000

Horizon90 days

Illustrative route / 01

Cedar Reserve

Network Alpha · Cedar Protocol · Stablecoin lending

Example fit

Estimated net gain / 90 days+$110.18After modeled route costs. Not a guarantee.

Headline APY: 10.0%
Direct route cost: $8.60
Modeled risk: 31/100
Evidence coverage: 86%

Why this route appears here

Modeled gain remains positive after costs. Example liquidity accommodates $5,000, while risk and evidence stay visible alongside the return.

Liquidity Entry and exit capacity must fit the position.

Main trade-off Yield can change. Protocol and withdrawal risk remain.

The return, reconciled.

Estimated gross return: +$118.90
Entry network fee: −$1.00
Bridge estimate: −$2.00
Swap / slippage estimate: −$2.00
Exit cost: −$3.60
Yield foregone on entry costs: −$0.12
Estimated net gain: +$110.18

Static example, assuming constant 10% APY. Costs and modeled return are estimates, not executable quotes.

Risk ≠ evidence.

Modeled risk31/100

Moderate illustrative risk. Lower is lower modeled risk.

Evidence coverage86%

How much of the weighted risk assessment has supporting inputs.

86% coverage does not mean “86% safe.” It describes available evidence, never the chance of avoiding loss.

Synthetic values. No live sources or audit implied.

Yield. Costs. Liquidity. Risk. Evidence.In one explained decision.

Built around the decision.
And the person making it.

Your capital. Your clock.

$500 for a week and $50,000 for six months are different decisions. The evaluation should change with them.

Your funds stay yours.

Read-only intelligence. No custody, signatures, deposits, bridging, swaps or automatic execution.

Reasoning you can read.

See assumptions, modeled costs and evidence gaps. Understand why a route appears, and what could change it.

The route starts
with your objective.

Give your capital a context.
Find the opportunities that fit.